By The Book Reviews

Punctilious & Pedantic Reviews of NYT Best Sellers

Cover for A REVOLUTION OF COMMON SENSE

A REVOLUTION OF COMMON SENSE

By Scott Jennings

Publisher: Morrow

The conservative commentator and strategist gives his take on President Trump’s return to power.

Review by By The Books Reviewer

Scott Jennings's "A Revolution of Common Sense: How Donald Trump Stormed Washington and Fought for Western Civilization" is a sycophantic homage to the former president's second term, offering little more than a regurgitation of partisan talking points. ([kirkusreviews.com](https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/scott-jennings/a-revolution-of-common-sense/?utm_source=openai))

Jennings, a CNN commentator and Republican strategist, presents himself as an insider with unparalleled access to Trump's inner circle. However, this proximity results in a narrative that is more hagiography than objective analysis. The book is replete with uncritical praise, portraying Trump as a savior of Western civilization while conveniently omitting or downplaying controversies and failures. ([kirkusreviews.com](https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/scott-jennings/a-revolution-of-common-sense/?utm_source=openai))

The author's attempt to frame Trump's actions as a restoration of "common sense" is both simplistic and disingenuous. Complex policy decisions are reduced to binary choices between the virtuous Trump administration and the villainous "radical leftists." Such reductionism does a disservice to readers seeking a nuanced understanding of the political landscape.

Moreover, Jennings's writing is marred by a lack of critical engagement. He parrots the administration's narratives without scrutiny, resulting in a text that reads more like propaganda than informed commentary. The absence of diverse perspectives further undermines the book's credibility.

In conclusion, "A Revolution of Common Sense" fails to provide a substantive or balanced account of Trump's second term. Its overt bias and lack of analytical depth render it unworthy of serious consideration. Readers interested in a comprehensive and objective examination of this period would be better served elsewhere.

Final recommendation: Not recommended.

Recommendation: Not recommended.

written on: 11/27/2025