By The Book Reviews

Punctilious & Pedantic Reviews of NYT Best Sellers

Cover for THE MAGA DOCTRINE

THE MAGA DOCTRINE

By Charlie Kirk

Publisher: Broadside

The founder of Turning Point U.S.A. espouses some ideas promulgated by President Trump.

Review by By The Books Reviewer

Charlie Kirk's "The MAGA Doctrine: The Only Ideas That Will Win the Future" is a sycophantic homage to Donald Trump, masquerading as a political treatise. Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, attempts to distill the essence of the MAGA movement into a coherent ideology but falls woefully short.

The book is replete with uncritical adulation, portraying Trump as a near-messianic figure. Kirk's prose is riddled with clichés and lacks substantive analysis. For instance, he describes Trump as "a bold, experimenting giant" and "a man who never surrenders," without providing concrete examples to support these grandiose claims. This lack of depth renders the work more of a propaganda piece than a serious political discourse.

Critics have noted Kirk's opportunistic shift in allegiance. Initially dismissive of Trump, Kirk later became one of his most fervent supporters. This about-face raises questions about the authenticity of his convictions. As Ben Sixsmith observes, Kirk's claim of being "MAGA before it was cool" is disingenuous and undermines his credibility. ([thespectator.com](https://thespectator.com/book-and-art/charlie-kirk-about-turn-maga-doctrine/?utm_source=openai))

Furthermore, the book's ideological shallowness is glaring. Kirk's arguments are often superficial and lack the rigor expected of a political manifesto. His treatment of complex issues like trade and immigration is simplistic, failing to engage with the nuances that these topics demand. This superficiality diminishes the book's value as a serious contribution to political thought.

In summary, "The MAGA Doctrine" is a poorly executed attempt to codify the MAGA movement's principles. Its lack of critical analysis, combined with Kirk's opportunistic stance and shallow arguments, make it a disappointing read. Readers seeking a thoughtful exploration of contemporary conservative ideology would be better served elsewhere.

Recommendation: Not recommended.

written on: 10/2/2025