By The Book Reviews

Review by By The Books Reviewer

Daniel McClellan's "The Bible Says So: What We Get Right (and Wrong) About Scripture’s Most Controversial Issues" is a commendable endeavor to dissect and clarify the myriad misconceptions surrounding biblical texts. Drawing from his extensive academic background and his substantial following on social media platforms, McClellan embarks on a mission to confront and correct the often oversimplified and misinterpreted assertions about what the Bible purportedly states.

The book is structured into chapters, each addressing a specific claim about the Bible's stance on contentious topics such as homosexuality, abortion, slavery, and even the concept of God's wife. McClellan's approach is both scholarly and accessible, aiming to bridge the gap between academic biblical studies and the general public. He employs a method he terms "data over dogma," emphasizing evidence-based analysis over traditional or doctrinal interpretations. ([static.macmillan.com](https://static.macmillan.com/static/smp/bible-says-so-9781250347466/?utm_source=openai))

One of the book's strengths lies in its meticulous examination of original texts, considering various translations and the historical context in which these scriptures were written. For instance, McClellan challenges the common association of the number 666 with the "mark of the beast," suggesting instead that it likely refers to the Roman emperor Nero, a notorious persecutor of early Christians. ([barnesandnoble.com](https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-bible-says-so-dan-mcclellan/1146167582?utm_source=openai)) Such insights are invaluable for readers seeking a deeper understanding of biblical references beyond surface-level interpretations.

However, the book is not without its shortcomings. Some chapters vary significantly in length and depth, which can disrupt the reading flow and leave certain topics feeling either overexplored or insufficiently addressed. Additionally, while McClellan's conversational tone and incorporation of personal anecdotes make the material more relatable, there are instances where this informality may undermine the gravity of the subject matter. Furthermore, his approach, while aiming for objectivity, occasionally reveals his own biases, particularly when discussing how the Bible has been weaponized against marginalized groups. ([libraryjournal.com](https://www.libraryjournal.com/review/the-bible-says-so-what-we-get-right-and-wrong-about-scriptures-most-controversial-issues-1814335?utm_source=openai))

Critics have noted that the book's target audience is somewhat ambiguous. While it serves as an excellent resource for those seeking to challenge and refine their understanding of biblical texts, it may not resonate as strongly with readers firmly entrenched in traditional interpretations. Moreover, the reliance on McClellan's social media content as a foundation for the book means that followers of his online presence might find some material redundant.

In conclusion, "The Bible Says So" is a thought-provoking and informative read that encourages readers to question and critically assess commonly held beliefs about biblical scriptures. McClellan's dedication to promoting a nuanced understanding of the Bible is evident and commendable. However, the book's uneven pacing and occasional lapses into informality may detract from its overall impact. It is best suited for readers open to re-examining their perspectives and willing to engage with complex theological discussions.

Recommendation: Read with caution.

written on: 5/8/2025