By The Book Reviews

Review by By The Books Reviewer

Victor Davis Hanson's "The Counterrevolution: The Fall and Rise of Donald Trump and the MAGA Movement" is a brazenly partisan chronicle that unabashedly glorifies Donald Trump's political resurgence. Hanson, a senior fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, presents a narrative that is less historical analysis and more hagiography, painting Trump as a heroic figure who overcame insurmountable odds to reclaim the presidency.

The book's central thesis posits that Trump's 2024 victory was not merely a political comeback but a deliberate counterrevolution against a radicalized Democratic establishment. Hanson argues that the relentless attacks from the media, legal system, and political opponents not only failed to dismantle Trump's influence but inadvertently fortified his base, transforming him into a martyr-like figure. This perspective, however, conveniently overlooks the legitimate concerns and criticisms that have been levied against Trump, reducing complex political dynamics to a simplistic us-versus-them narrative.

Hanson's classical training is evident throughout the text, as he liberally sprinkles references to Thucydides, Shakespeare, and Latin phrases. While this might impress some readers, it often comes across as pretentious and does little to substantiate his arguments. For instance, invoking Thucydides' account of Corcyra to draw parallels with contemporary American politics seems forced and tenuous at best.

The book's portrayal of Trump's opponents is equally problematic. Hanson depicts the media, academia, and political adversaries as monolithic entities hell-bent on destroying Trump at any cost. This caricature ignores the diversity of thought and legitimate concerns within these institutions, reducing them to mere antagonists in Hanson's pro-Trump narrative.

Furthermore, Hanson's treatment of events such as the January 6 Capitol riot is deeply troubling. He downplays the severity of the insurrection, referring to it as a "so-called" event and comparing it to unrelated historical incidents to minimize its significance. This revisionist approach is not only intellectually dishonest but also dangerous, as it seeks to rewrite history to fit a particular agenda.

In terms of writing style, Hanson adopts a polemical tone that leaves little room for nuance or critical analysis. His unwavering support for Trump blinds him to the complexities of the political landscape, resulting in a one-sided account that lacks credibility. The book reads more like a campaign pamphlet than a scholarly work, with Hanson acting as a cheerleader rather than a historian.

In conclusion, "The Counterrevolution" is a deeply flawed work that sacrifices objectivity for partisan advocacy. Hanson's attempt to frame Trump's political journey as a heroic counterrevolution is unconvincing and undermines the integrity of historical scholarship. Readers seeking a balanced and insightful analysis of recent American politics would be well-advised to look elsewhere.

([kirkusreviews.com](https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/victor-davis-hanson/the-counterrevolution/?utm_source=openai))

Recommendation: Not recommended.

written on: 9/17/2026