By The Book Reviews

Review by By The Books Reviewer

In "107 Days," former Vice President Kamala Harris endeavors to provide an insider's account of her whirlwind 2024 presidential campaign, initiated after President Joe Biden's abrupt withdrawal from the race. The memoir's title aptly reflects the brief duration of her campaign, yet the content within these pages leaves much to be desired.

Harris's narrative is marred by a pervasive tone of self-justification and blame-shifting. She criticizes the Democratic Party's decision to allow Biden to determine his re-election bid, labeling it as "recklessness" ([apnews.com](https://apnews.com/article/473ca75fb9fb5fa157a788bcf3ecc941?utm_source=openai)). While she acknowledges Biden's competence, she simultaneously highlights his age-related challenges, particularly his lackluster debate performance against Donald Trump. This duality suggests a calculated attempt to distance herself from the administration's shortcomings while maintaining a veneer of loyalty.

The memoir's structure, with chapters counting down from 107 days to Election Day, aims to create a sense of urgency but instead becomes monotonous. Readers are subjected to tedious accounts of campaign stops, superficial interactions, and repetitive affirmations of Harris's commitment to the American people. This approach results in a narrative that feels both self-aggrandizing and lacking in substantive reflection.

Critics have not been kind. The Guardian describes the book as having a "negative tone and inability to provide the reader with closure," though it does not fault the writing quality ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/107_Days?utm_source=openai)). Stephen A. Smith dismisses the memoir, questioning its relevance and suggesting that Harris's political career is effectively over ([thedailybeast.com](https://www.thedailybeast.com/stephen-a-smith-torches-kamala-harris-new-book-107-days-who-cares/?utm_source=openai)). Such critiques underscore the book's failure to offer meaningful insights or a compelling narrative.

Furthermore, Harris's portrayal of her vice-presidential selection process reveals a troubling perspective. She expresses concerns about potential running mates' ambitions, particularly highlighting Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's desire to be involved in decision-making as a negative trait ([thenews.com.pk](https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/1345795-kamala-harris-memoir-107-days-critiques-biden-details-2024-campaign-shortfalls?utm_source=openai)). This viewpoint suggests a preference for subservience over collaboration, raising questions about her leadership style.

In conclusion, "107 Days" is a disappointing memoir that fails to provide the introspection and depth expected from a political figure of Harris's stature. The book's focus on deflecting blame and its lack of engaging content make it a tedious read. Readers seeking genuine insight into the 2024 campaign would be better served elsewhere.

Recommendation: Not recommended.

written on: 10/2/2025